Which Generation Is Most Likely to Be a Serial Killer?

I love a good true crime show. Growing up, I enjoyed traditional detective shows like Columbo and Murder, She Wrote. Later, I enjoyed Monk and Psych, among others_._ If it wasn’t one of those, I remember watching Forensic Files or Cold Case Files with my family.

This essay is a bit different and almost a behind-the-scenes look at how I chase down different ideas to see if they’re viable or just interesting. While working on my book, I scoured old notes with different ideas and concepts I had jotted down. One note caught my attention: “Serial Killers and the Sexual Revolution.”

With all the skeleton and ghoul decor this time of year, I decided I would write a spooky essay of sorts.

On my note, I listed five names: Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Dennis Rader, and Gary Ridgway. Underneath were these questions: “Is there a connection between serial killers, media, and the sexual revolution?” and “Did a certain generation breed more serial killers than another?”

My hypothesis was that Boomers or maybe the Silent Generation would be the deadliest generation…so here is what my research turned up.

What lined up

Start with birth years. Gacy, 1942 (Biography.com, n.d.-d). Rader, 1945 (Biography.com, n.d.-a). Bundy, 1946 (Biography.com, n.d.-e). Ridgway, 1949 (Biography.com, n.d.-b). Dahmer, 1960 (Biography.com, n.d.-c). By generational definitions, that is two Silent Generation and three Boomers. But, considering the generational blur, you could argue that the tight band of 8 years’ difference is an interesting coincidence.

So I dug further… 3 of the 5 were born or raised in the Midwest: Gacy in Chicago (Biography.com, n.d.-d), Dahmer in Ohio (Biography.com, n.d.-c), and Rader in Wichita, Kansas (Oxygen, n.d.-a). Four of them started killing between ages 27 and 33 (Biography.com, n.d.-e; Biography.com, n.d.-d; Biography.com, n.d.-b; Biography.com, n.d.-a).

Then the strange details.

Gacy started in 1972 (Biography.com, n.d.-d). Rader started in 1974 (Biography.com, n.d.-a), and the first crimes police can attribute to Bundy came in 1974 too (Oxygen, n.d.-b). Bundy and Ridgway both grew up in Tacoma, Washington (Harvard Gazette, 2025). Years later, Bundy wrote to a Green River task force detective from death row and offered to help catch a killer who turned out to be Ridgway (Keppel & Birnes, 1995).

I looked at other angles to see if they had anything similar in appearance or birth order or favorite breakfast cereal (surprisingly, that one turned up no results ;). The only similar physical characteristic is that Bundy, Gacy, and Dahmer stood 5’11”, 5’10”, and 6’0” (Crime + Investigation, n.d.).

And just for one other odd coincidence, Bundy’s birthday is November 24 (Biography.com, n.d.-e). And his 17th birthday, in 1963, was the day Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald on live television (Flashback Dallas, 2018).

Why those years matter

Psychologists argue about the exact window that forms people’s identity, but they agree generally. The early years are the most active period for establishing neural connections (Center on the Developing Child, n.d.). It is adolescence that reshapes identity. The World Health Organization defines adolescence as ages 10 to 19, and a 2018 Lancet paper argues for 10 to 24 (Sawyer et al., 2018). Regardless of the “exact” ages, the punchline is the same—What you see, and what happens to you and around you during these formative years, leaves a mark.

In November 1963, JFK was assassinated, and all eyes turned to the Television. At that moment in history, Gacy was 21, Rader was 18, Bundy was 16 (he turned 17 that Sunday), and Ridgway was 14. (Dahmer, born in 1960, was three.) That week, the networks dropped regular programming and NBC alone stayed on the air for nearly 72 hours (Inquirer, 2013; Flashback Dallas, 2018). On Sunday, NBC’s cameras caught Oswald’s shooting live (American Heritage, 1997). Broadcasters of the time called it the first real-life homicide carried nationally on live television (Flashback Dallas, 2018).

We like to blame the 24-hour news cycle for shaping Millennials the most, but it didn’t start with them.

The second question: Serial Killers and the Sexual Revolution

Looking at their formative years, I wondered what role the Sexual Revolution might have played in their development. In 1964, as the movement was gaining traction, Rader was 19, Bundy was 18, and Ridgway was 15. Gacy was 22. Only Dahmer, at four, was too young. Gacy started killing in 1972, and Rader and Bundy in 1974, with the revolution still in full swing. Add the new flood of sexual imagery, music, and media, and I wondered whether it overwhelmed someone already headed down a dark road.

So I dug a bit further… the timing fit, but the cause did not. Everyone born in the 1940s grew up in that era, so there is no comparison group. A review of 20 years of research on adolescents and pornography concluded the evidence “precludes internally valid causal conclusions” (Peter & Valkenburg, 2016). I could not find a single study that links the sexual revolution to serial murder.

The killing spree spike, and the fall off

To this point, nothing was conclusive, and the data were circumstantial at best. In the Radford University database, 72 U.S. serial killers began killing in the 1950s. In the 1980s, 768 did. That is nearly 11 times as many. Then it fell: 669 in the 1990s, and 371 in the 2000s, a drop of nearly half (Radford University Serial Killer Information Center, 2016). Recent years are undercounted because killers take years to be caught but it is a fascinating chart to look at.

Many theories

There are many theories for why we saw a spike and a fall. Author Caroline Fraser, in Murderland (Fraser, 2025), points to lead and arsenic pollution from a Tacoma copper smelter, a link she presents as one ingredient among many (Harvard Gazette, 2025). Historian Philip Jenkins credits the sexual revolution, a drug subculture that pushed people into red-light districts, and Baby Boomers’ willingness to take risks with strangers (Jenkins, 2025). Again, much of this is speculative.

Here is one that lines up. Economist Jennifer Doleac found that state DNA databases deter crime by the offenders profiled in them and are associated with lower overall crime (Doleac, 2017). The count slipped in the 1990s, then fell hard in the 2000s. The odds of getting caught seemed to increase, potentially deterring future criminals.

Why the fear outlasted the killers

The impact and fear caused by these horrific acts have still left their mark. Lenore Skenazy, founder of Let Grow, told me on The Ryan Vet Show that something changed in the 1980s (Vet, 2026). Cable gave us the 24-hour news cycle. A couple of high-profile kidnappings, including Adam Walsh, whose father, John Walsh, started America’s Most Wanted, made missing children a national story and a fear for many parents. Then came the kids on the milk cartons. Skenazy shared a staggering stat on the podcast. She stated that you would have to leave a child outside, unattended, for 750,000 years before a stranger kidnapping became statistically likely. (Vet, 2026) I wrote about how that fear reshaped childhood in When Freedom Became Fear.

Related essay

Sorry Gen X, You're the Least Likely Generation to Become the Next CEO

A unique convergence of generations is shaking up the C-suite, causing a barbell effect, squeezing Gen X out of top seats in organizations. August 19, 2025

Kidnapping and serial killers had a consequential crossover. John Walsh testified at a July 1983 Senate hearing on serial murder (U.S. Senate, 1983). While both crimes are independently horrific, putting them in the same hearing may have amplified fear.

Safer, or just alone?

We may be physically safer now than in the 1980s and 1990s. Statistically, fewer serial killers is encouraging. But are we actually safer as a society? DNA databases deter crime (Doleac, 2017).

While progress may have elevated safety from some heinous crimes, there are silent killers now, too. Anxiety, depression, and the kind of isolation that quietly wears a body down. I’ve shared this many times and will share it again. In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General declared an epidemic of loneliness. His advisory reports that poor social relationships raise the risk of heart disease by 29% and stroke by 32%, and it compares the mortality impact of social disconnection to smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day (Office of the Surgeon General, 2023). I wrote more about this in We’ve Never Been More Alone.

None of this makes light of any loss of life. Murder is horrible, whether it is one victim or many. Kidnapping is devastating.

Closing thoughts

But there are two big points I want you to walk away with….

The first is to show you my process and how I chase down generational labels to see if they are real or just simply culturally established labels. I use the Generational Prism for this analysis quite a bit. And as you can see here, most of the data is circumstantial. But it does matter how we treat our team today…

I often ask what’s wrong with Gen Z. Why are they lazy or anxious? What is Gen Alpha going to be like? We have mostly grown out of the Millennial name-calling. Not entirely, but mostly.

It is easy to cluster things together because we see some patterns—but we have to chase them down and get to the bottom of it. For example, if you have two team members who are both Gen Z, and they show up late, leave early, and complain. But have you looked at the other four team members who are also Gen Z and performing exactly how you’d hope?

And then the second takeaway: Progress and technology and science have allowed us to solve crimes faster, as well as deter crimes from even happening in the first place. That is a good thing. But what are we silently trading? Are we placing our trust and faith in security in cameras and surveillance and devices? If so, are there additional consequences?

Thanks for taking a detour from my standard essay to be a bit more on theme with Halloween this weekend!

Inspire Forward,