Ryan Vet on Still Launching: Why Gen Z Isn't Broken

A conversation with parenting coach Evan Sanchez about the Gen X parents of stuck college grads — why the generation looks lazy from the outside, and what it was never given the chance to learn.

Guest appearance Video with Evan Sanchez on Still Launching

Watch the full conversation on Still Launching →

The short version

On Still Launching (Episode 3, October 6, 2026), generational futurist Ryan Vet told parenting coach Evan Sanchez that Gen Z is not broken — it is under-rehearsed. Using his Generational Prism, which reads a cohort by age, by moment in history, and by what those two refract into, he dismantled the job-hopper label: millennials held just 0.3 more jobs than boomers or Gen X by age 25, a gap that looks large only because child labor laws pushed each generation's first job later. His argument is that most Gen Z grads reached 22 without a bad boss, a bad client or a job they hated, so the formative failures older generations collected at fourteen are arriving all at once in a performance review. He also traced the Generational Pendulum through its four beats — experience, challenge, overcorrect, recalibrate — and the shifting markers of trust and respect from boomers to Gen Beta.

Ryan Vet · Video on Still Launching

The question Evan Sanchez hears from Gen X parents is always some version of the same one: what is wrong with this kid? Ryan Vet's answer, about ninety seconds into this episode, is that the question is the problem. "I think you just said one of the worst things that anyone can say, but it's so easy and we all do it."

What follows is seventeen minutes of a generational futurist taking apart the lazy-grad story with data, and putting something harder in its place. Gen Z did not fail to launch. Gen Z was never handed the launchpad — no splinter to dig out, no bad boss at sixteen, no walk to the mall unsupervised — and the bill for all of that missing practice is coming due in a first job instead of a first summer job.

Ryan's Big Takeaways

  1. 01

    "What's wrong with kids these days?" is the sentence that guarantees you will misread them.

    Evan sets it up honestly, from his own side of the table: Gen X looks at a grad still at home and compares it to being out of the house with a job at the same age. Ryan stops him on the phrasing. "I think you just said one of the worst things that anyone can say, but it's so easy and we all do it. It's 'What's wrong with kids these days?' or 'when I was your age.'" He immediately includes himself — "I'm guilty of it," he says, aiming it at his own Gen Alpha kids over a splinter. The point is not politeness. The sentence smuggles in an assumption that the two childhoods were comparable, and once you have assumed that, every difference reads as a defect.

    The Generational Prism →
  2. 02

    Millennials were never job hoppers. They had 0.3 more jobs, and a later start.

    This is the cleanest demolition in the episode, and Ryan uses the previous generation deliberately because the data set is complete. The headline said millennials could not hold a job. The number says that by age 25 they had held 0.3 more jobs than boomers or Gen X — not ten more, not three more, three tenths of one. What changed was the starting line. Boomers faced almost no child labor laws and could work at twelve or thirteen; Gen X started at fourteen to sixteen depending on the state; most millennials did not hold a first job until around twenty-two, after college. Compress the same number of jobs into a shorter window and you manufacture a job hopper out of arithmetic. He makes the same move on the 2008 headlines asking why millennials were not buying houses, when most of the generation did not yet have a driver's license.

    The Generational Prism →
  3. 03

    The missing variable is not ambition. It is reps.

    Ryan is careful to call it a gross generalization before he makes it: most Gen Zers, particularly middle and upper middle class ones, were not expected to lift a finger. The expectation was college. So the whole apprenticeship in ordinary workplace misery never happened — the bad boss, the toxic client, the customer you cannot please, the toilet you have to clean, the sales job you discover you hate. "You and I have both had bad bosses. We have had bad clients. We have had all sorts of toxic work environments," he tells Evan, and the difference is that they collected those at Dairy Queen or Target across a decade. For a Gen Z grad it all arrives in year one of a salaried career, with a performance review attached. His conclusion is blunt about where the responsibility sits: "we've actually done a disservice to Gen Z, and now it's our job to come in and — I don't want to say fix it, but at least provide the opportunities for them to fall down and learn and fail, and tell them it's okay."

    The Friction Doctrine →
  4. 04

    They do not trust themselves because nobody ever let them practice being trusted.

    Evan offers the observation from his coaching practice — these grads do not yet trust their own judgment — and Ryan takes it somewhere specific. Each generation has its own marker for trust: boomers wanted stability in institutions, Gen X wanted reliability in people, millennials wanted information, and Gen Z, drowning in information, settled on authenticity. But self-trust is a different thing, and it is earned. "We wouldn't let them leave the house without tracking devices, or leave the house at all. We just stick them in front of the iPad because it was safer and nothing bad would happen if they weren't playing outside. They couldn't get stung by the bee or get that splinter that they'd have to figure out." Then he widens it past parents: when Evan's kids were nine and ten they could walk a mall, and the under-18 mall restrictions arrived afterward. Society withdrew the trust too.

    Childhood Surveillance →
  5. 05

    Disrespect is real. It is also just a different rulebook.

    Ryan does not let the generation entirely off the hook, which is what makes the argument land. "There is an element where they do show more disrespect," he says — but respect has been re-specified every generation. Boomers respected the title and the institution. Gen X respected the adult, partly because the alternative was corporal punishment. Millennials were the break: the phone meant anyone was one step away, no white pages, no operator, no gatekeeper, and you could slide into a president's DMs whether or not you got a reply. Titles went with it — doctor, Mrs., Mister, the professor's surname — and the first-name default arrived. "Not saying they should have or shouldn't have," he adds, "but then you fast forward to Gen Z and that just continues on the pattern."

    The R.E.S.P.E.C.T. Framework →
  6. 06

    Evan says "overcorrect" twice, and Ryan names the machine behind the word.

    It is the best moment in the episode because the host gets there by accident. Evan describes protecting his kids from what happened to him and admits, "I felt like I overcorrected so much" — and later, that the good parts of a Gen X childhood came with nobody emotionally connecting with you, seen and not heard, the 10 o'clock do-you-know-where-your-children-are ad. Ryan catches the repetition: "you used overcorrect twice now, and that's part of the pendulum that I often write about." The beats are experience, challenge, overcorrect, recalibrate. And it is already swinging again — Gen Beta started being born in 2026, and Gen Z and younger millennial parents are cutting screen time to zero, pushing kids outside, choosing skills-based schools, "saying 'I was messed up because of my parents, so let me overcorrect.'"

    The Generational Pendulum →

The label is a shortcut, and the shortcut is the whole problem

What ties this conversation together is a single methodological complaint, and Ryan declares it before he says anything about Gen Z at all: "obviously I study generations, so I use labels, but I use them very sparingly, because every individual within that span of years has their own story, has different parents of different ages, different siblings."

Then he shows why the caution is not false modesty. Gen Z, as he dates it, runs from 1997 to 2012. That means the cohort currently being described with one adjective contains people entering high school this fall and people already married with children of their own. "Hey, they're all lazy, they're all disengaged" is not merely unkind; it is a claim about a fifteen-year span of birthdays, which is not a claim about anything.

The generation's actual formation is narrower and stranger than the label. These are the first people who do not know life without the smartphone and social media — Ryan points to Jonathan Haidt marking 2012 in The Anxious Generation, while declining to treat it as the whole story. The consequence he cares about is communication. Growing up on written, asynchronous, shorthand messaging makes you fluent and fast in text and unpracticed in the real-time silence of a face. "If you ask me a question and I just stare at you, your listeners are going to think their screen froze" — but on Instagram or WhatsApp, nobody has to answer right now. The Gen Z stare, which he has written about, comes out of that. So does the read of disengagement. Neither is evidence of a broken generation; both are evidence of where the reps went missing.

Standout Quotes

1 / 7
I think you just said one of the worst things that anyone can say, but it's so easy and we all do it. It's 'What's wrong with kids these days?' or 'when I was your age.'
Ryan Vet
Millennials only hopped jobs 0.3 times more than boomers or Gen X by the time they were 25. They didn't have 10 more jobs. They didn't have three more jobs. They had 0.3 more jobs.
Ryan Vet
They didn't flip burgers at McDonald's. They didn't get the oil spat around their hands and get yelled at by somebody.
Ryan Vet
We've actually done a disservice to Gen Z, and now it's our job to come in and — I don't want to say fix it, but at least provide the opportunities for them to fall down and learn and fail, and tell them it's okay.
Ryan Vet
We wouldn't let them leave the house without tracking devices, or leave the house at all. They couldn't get stung by the bee or get that splinter that they'd have to figure out.
Ryan Vet
Boomers wanted stability in institutions. Gen X wanted reliability in people. Millennials wanted information. Gen Z had too much information, so they said they wanted authenticity.
Ryan Vet
It doesn't mean that the generation is broken. It means that as leaders and as parents it's our job to figure out where those gaps are in the formative years.
Ryan Vet

Drag, swipe, or use the arrows to explore

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gen Z actually lazy or entitled?

Ryan Vet's answer on Still Launching is no — the generation is under-rehearsed, not defective. He points out that the label is applied to a fifteen-year span of birth years (1997 to 2012 by his definition) that currently contains both high school freshmen and married parents, which makes it a claim about nothing in particular. The substantive difference he does identify is missing reps: most Gen Z grads, especially middle and upper middle class ones, reached 22 without a bad boss, a bad client, or a job they hated, so the ordinary formative failures older generations collected from fourteen onward now arrive all at once in a salaried role.

Were millennials really job hoppers?

No, and Ryan uses the claim as a worked example of misreading a generation. By age 25, millennials had held just 0.3 more jobs than boomers or Gen X — three tenths of one job, not three and not ten. What actually differed was the starting line: boomers faced almost no child labor laws and could work at twelve or thirteen, Gen X started around fourteen to sixteen, and most millennials did not hold a first job until roughly twenty-two, after college. The same number of jobs compressed into a shorter window produces a "job hopper" without anyone changing their behavior.

What is the Generational Prism?

It is Ryan Vet's method for reading a generation, and he names it outright on this episode. It takes three factors: the age a person is, the moment in history they occupy at that age, and then — like a prism refracting light — what those two produce together. Applied to the millennial job-hopping headline it surfaces the child labor laws that moved the first job later. Applied to the 2008 "why aren't millennials buying houses" headlines it surfaces the fact that most of the generation did not yet have a driver's license.

What do Gen X parents most need to understand about their Gen Z kids?

That the comparison they are making is not valid, and that the sentence carrying it — "when I was your age" or "what's wrong with kids these days" — does the damage before any advice lands. Ryan's specific case to Gen X parents is that their own childhood supplied a long apprenticeship in low-stakes failure: splinters, bee stings, an unsupervised walk to the mall, a first job at sixteen with a boss who yelled. Their children were given tracking devices, an iPad as the safer option, and an expectation of college instead. The fix he proposes is not fixing the kid but restoring the opportunities to fall down, learn, fail, and be told it is okay.

How does each generation define trust and respect differently?

Ryan lays out both ladders. On trust: boomers looked for stability in institutions, Gen X for reliability in people, millennials for information, and Gen Z — having too much information — for authenticity. On respect: boomers respected the title and the institution, Gen X respected the adult (with corporal punishment as the backstop), and millennials broke the pattern once the smartphone removed every gatekeeper, dropping doctor, Mrs. and Mister for a first-name default even with teachers and professors. Gen Z, he says, simply continues that trajectory — which is why older generations read a different rulebook as disrespect.

Why does Ryan Vet say Gen Z does not trust its own judgment?

Because self-trust is earned through unsupervised consequence, and that was systematically removed. "We wouldn't let them leave the house without tracking devices, or leave the house at all," he says — the iPad was the safer option, and a child indoors cannot get stung by a bee or have to dig out their own splinter. He is careful not to blame parents alone; he notes that society withdrew the same trust, citing the under-18 mall restrictions that arrived after Gen X had already had the run of the place at nine or ten.

What is the Generational Pendulum and where is it swinging now?

It is Ryan's model for why each generation's parenting overshoots, and on this episode he gives it four beats: you experience something, you challenge it (usually in your formative years), you overcorrect for it as a parent, and then society recalibrates. The current swing is already visible. Gen Beta began being born in 2026, and Gen Z and younger-millennial parents are cutting screen time to zero, pushing kids back outdoors, and choosing more skills-based schooling — motivated, in his words, by "I was messed up because of my parents, so let me overcorrect."

Frameworks & Ideas Referenced

  • The Generational Prism : Named outright as his method — age, the moment in history someone occupies, and what those two refract into. It is the tool he uses on both the job-hopper and the house-buying headlines.
  • The Generational Pendulum : Laid out in four beats after Evan uses the word "overcorrect" twice: experience, challenge, overcorrect, recalibrate — with Gen Beta's 2026 arrival as the current swing.
  • The R.E.S.P.E.C.T. Framework implied : The respect ladder from title and institution, to the adult, to the millennial collapse of titles once the phone removed every gatekeeper.
  • The Friction Doctrine implied : The splinter, the bee sting and the absent first job — the reps a childhood has to include so that failure at 23 is not the first one.
  • Childhood Surveillance implied : Tracking devices, the iPad as the safer option, and under-18 mall restrictions as the moment society stopped extending trust too.
  • The Credibility Shift implied : Trust markers moving from stability in institutions (boomers) to reliability in people (Gen X) to information (millennials) to authenticity (Gen Z).

Books, People & Sources Mentioned

Keep Exploring

Links from this conversation

Full Transcript

The complete conversation between Evan Sanchez and Ryan Vet, transcribed in full. Key terms link to the ideas behind them.

Evan Sanchez #

So, if you have a Gen Z college grad who's struggling and you don't know what's really going on with him, stay with me — because we have Ryan Vet. He is a futurist. He is an author. He is a speaker. He's built and scaled companies. He's been on NBC, ABC, you name it. So today we're going to get some actual insights on what actually gets a college grad moving these days, and we'll also go into questions about the difference between generations. Welcome, Ryan. I'm so glad you're here.

Ryan Vet #

Evan, thank you so much for having me.

Evan Sanchez #

So I want to start off by — a lot of parents I speak to are Gen Xers, and they have no idea how Gen Z is thinking, especially as Gen Z is navigating this tough job market and the challenges with AI. What do Gen X parents really need to know?

Ryan Vet #

There's just so many things that are unique about Gen Z that make it different than any generation we've encountered. Before we get too far deep into the generational labels — obviously I study generations, so I use labels, but I use them very sparingly, because every individual within that span of years has their own story, has different parents of different ages, different siblings. But when you're looking at Gen Z, the way I define it is from 1997 to 2012. Those are the birth years. And really you see in that time frame some of the most formative years being shaped by technology. Now, millennials of course were exposed to technology throughout their entire life. But what makes Gen Z so interesting is they don't know life without technology being really a part of our everyday life. And when I say technology, I'm not just talking about internet. I'm talking about the smartphone, and I'm talking about social media in particular, which created a whole new experience for a generation. And we didn't really know what technology was doing, what they had access to, until — in many cases, I don't like using the term too late, because I don't ever believe it's too late, but we didn't realize the impact that it had on their lives in their formative years until much later.

Evan Sanchez #

It's really interesting, because Gen X grew up without technology and then with technology, right? And Gen Z never saw that. They don't know what Blockbuster is.

Ryan Vet #

Sadly, they don't. Blockbuster is — well, thanks to maybe Stranger Things or some of these other movies and sitcoms and TV shows set in the '80s, maybe. But what you're starting to see with Gen X is, you hit the nail on the head. Gen X is not afraid of technology because of the way they were raised. They were raised, you know, they could be outside till the street lights came on. They had, in many cases — I argue — the best childhood in recent history. And they still had arcades. They had Pac-Man. They had technology. They had more than one screen in the house, which is a big moment. We have to think about that too. They started to see, especially later Gen X, maybe two TVs in the house, or one in a basement and a family room area. So they did start to see this evolution. So it did start with them, but we really saw this uptick even past millennials when it came to the smartphone. It's probably one of the biggest indicators. Jonathan Haidt, in The Anxious Generation, does a fantastic job marking 2012 as sort of this monumental year. Now, I don't think that's the whole story, and I don't think that characterizes every person within a generation, but you do see this generation that has grown up completely watched, completely expected to basically fake it till they make it — and fake it in front of their friends, which creates all sorts of issues with trust and ways they communicate. They often come across as disengaged or disrespectful, which might not actually be the true story underneath all of those labels.

Evan Sanchez #

What is the true story behind all those labels? Because, you know, from the Gen X perspective — to your point — they can be seen as disrespectful, or not interested, or not caring.

Ryan Vet #

Yeah, there's quite a lot that goes on. And I think one of the biggest things that people have to remember — and I bring this back to millennials, so let's skip back a generation. When you look at millennials in 2008 and 2009, all the headlines we're reading: why are millennials not buying houses? Well, the reality is most of them didn't even have a driver's license yet. There were some millennials, very few, old enough to legally buy a house. We're talking about 18, 19 years old — but what 18 or 19 year olds are buying a house? There's not many of those around. And so we started to cast these labels: on why aren't millennials buying houses, why are millennials lazy, why are they delaying jobs, all of these questions. But the reality is the whole generation wasn't even old enough to hit some of these markers. So when we talk about Gen Z, if you're looking at that cohort by definition, some of them are teenagers still. They haven't even thought about college yet. And some of them are entering high school for the first time this year. So we've got some that are in that bucket, but then you fast forward to the earlier-born Gen Z, the ones born in the late '90s — they're already into the workforce and now they're starting families. So you have a large range of individuals that are there. And so I think one of the things we have to be so careful with is characterizing and saying, "Hey, they're all lazy, they're all disengaged." But then we also have to think about how they were raised. So when you think about formation — when you're staring in front of this device the whole time, your communication, your whole technology becomes what you're looking at right here in front of your face. You learn to write really well, or at least write quickly and respond quickly. A lot of it's in shorthand, but you're more comfortable with a written word than a spoken word. And the great thing is, right now, if you ask me a question and I just stare at you, your listeners are going to think their screen froze. They're going to start hitting refresh. However, in text communication, or even Facebook Messenger, Instagram, WhatsApp, you name it — you don't have to respond right away. And so it creates this barrier, and Gen Z often gets accused of not communicating well, not communicating back. You have the Gen Z stare, which is a real phenomenon — I documented it in one of my essays. But all these things in large part are due to technology, and it doesn't mean that the generation is broken. It means that as leaders and as parents it's our job to figure out where those gaps are in the formative years, and how do we bring them along?

Evan Sanchez #

Yeah. And how do we bring them along? Because, you know, Gen X is looking at this from a very dated viewpoint of, like, well, when I was your age I was out of the house and getting a job, and no problem. And now a lot of these kids are stuck at home and the parents are like, "What's wrong with this kid?"

Ryan Vet #

And I think you just said one of the worst things that anyone can say, but it's so easy and we all do it. It's "What's wrong with kids these days?" or "when I was your age." And we do that so often, and I'm guilty of it. You know, when I was your age — to my Gen Alpha kids — you know, when I was your age we didn't have to do this, or if I got a splinter I'd figure out how to take it out myself. Don't come running to me. And we're always tough on the next generation. But if we really stop and look at some of the data — I often share what I call the Generational Prism. And that Generational Prism looks at three factors. It looks at the age someone is, the moment in time that they exist, and then after that, a prism reflects or refracts light, and that's the answer. And so one of the big things I look at is, everyone says millennials — I'm rewinding a generation again, because there's more data on full generations in the workforce — they said millennials are job hoppers. They're hopping everywhere and all of that. Well, if you go back, millennials only hopped jobs 0.3 times more than boomers or Gen X by the time they were 25. They didn't have 10 more jobs. They didn't have three more jobs. They had 0.3 more jobs than both their parents and maybe their grandparents, depending on where they were born on that spectrum. And so everyone's like, "Wait, that doesn't make sense." Well, we often don't remember what those moments were like when we were younger. And if you look at it — that's the age component, is by age 25. You look at the moment: well, baby boomers had almost no child labor laws in the United States. So they could work at 12, 13, 14. You have Gen X that started to have some child labor laws depending on where you were, and so you're looking at 15, 16 for a first job, sometimes 14. And then most millennials, they didn't start their first job till about 22, after college. So did they hop more jobs in a finite amount of time? Absolutely they did. So there is truth to that. But we have to look at it as — you know what, you were trying to get your reps when you worked at Dairy Queen or when you worked at Target or when you worked at wherever it was, and you realized you didn't like that boss, and you didn't like that work environment, and you didn't like dealing with customers in that way, and you had to clean the toilet. You didn't like sales. And whatever it was, you learned all of those things over a longer period of time. Gen Z didn't work — and that's a gross generalization, but most Gen Zers didn't have to lift a finger, especially if they were in middle or upper middle class. They were expected to go to college. That was the expectation as a whole. And then when they get out to the workforce, they're going to have bad bosses. I know for a fact you and I have both had bad bosses. We have had bad clients. We have had all sorts of toxic work environments. And now all of that's getting compressed into what you're expecting someone to come to the workforce for the first time — but they didn't flip burgers at McDonald's. They didn't get the oil spat around their hands and get yelled at by somebody and, you know, see drugs being dealt out of the back. I'm not saying that happens at McDonald's, but growing up, you know, I had that experience. So all of those things play into what shapes and forms us as individuals. And if you don't have those formative experiences, and all your formation is happening from Instagram and TikTok reels here on your phone, you're not going to get that robust experience that some of the previous generations did. So we've actually done a disservice to Gen Z, and now it's our job to come in and — I don't want to say fix it, but at least provide the opportunities for them to fall down and learn and fail, and tell them it's okay.

Evan Sanchez #

Yeah, that's one of the big things I teach — that, you know, they don't trust their own judgment yet at this age. And so they have to make the mistakes. They have to fall down.

Ryan Vet #

Yep. And when they're older, we're like, "Oh well, they're 22, 23, 24. They should know all this stuff by now." But they don't.

Evan Sanchez #

And I love the way you put that, because I think that it's really important for parents to understand that they didn't have the same experience that they did. And so now they're getting into the workforce and they're being seen as disrespectful, where they didn't realize — they didn't know what a bad boss was.

Ryan Vet #

Exactly. You said trust — you brought up that idea, and I think that's such an important idea, because each generation trusts differently. For boomers, they wanted stability. For Gen X, they wanted more reliability in people, whereas boomers, it was stability in institutions. And millennials, they wanted information. That was their source of trust — like, the more information they could consume, the better. Well, Gen Z had too much information. So they said they wanted authenticity. And they want this authentic view of trust. But you said they don't trust themselves, and I think there's a large part of that that's accurate, because they haven't had to think for themselves. And I think, again, that's where — you know, I don't want to blame parents. I'm a parent. You always second guess, and we're not perfect. But as a society, we didn't give this whole generation an opportunity to earn trust. We wouldn't let them leave the house without tracking devices, or leave the house at all. We just stick them in front of the iPad because it was safer, and nothing bad would happen if they weren't playing outside. They couldn't get stung by the bee or get that splinter that they'd have to figure out. And so they never learned how to trust themselves, how to trust others in the way that previous generations did. Not saying all the previous generations got it right, but they had a different experience that Gen Z just never had, because we didn't allow them to have it — in the hopes that we were keeping them safer and giving them a better future.

Evan Sanchez #

I think Gen X — and I'll speak to my own parenting experience — I definitely overcorrected, right? I didn't want them to have the same bad things that happened to me as a child, as a teenager, and stuff like that. So I did my best to protect them. But I felt like I overcorrected so much. And now, you know, when I ask my kids to get their car inspected, it's like a big thing.

Ryan Vet #

They didn't have parents, or the community, or even society trusting in them to do that. I mean, when your kids were growing up — think about this. Mall restrictions came in. You couldn't be under 18 at a mall. That was formative for Gen X, and you were 9, 10, 11 at the mall. But now if you walk into some of these big box retailers unsupervised, they get security out there and ask where your parents were. And so, just a totally different experience. And then it's not just parents, it's society. We're looking at these kids as kids still, and they're adults — but we never gave them the opportunity to experience, in a safe environment, the hardness that life brings.

Evan Sanchez #

There were some good parts about being Gen X.

Ryan Vet #

Yeah, absolutely. Right. There absolutely were. But there are also some downsides, because nobody was emotionally connecting with us.

Evan Sanchez #

You know, kids were to be seen, not heard. I mean, that was still back in the era where the TV was like, "It's 10 o'clock. Do you know where your children are?" — sort of thing.

Ryan Vet #

And now we've kind of overcorrected. And so then we just put these labels on them, as disrespectful or lazy or things like that.

Evan Sanchez #

But that's not really the case. We're not looking at it through the right prism, to your point.

Ryan Vet #

Yeah. And I mean, there is an element where they do show more disrespect. Our rules for respect are different by generation. We each respect differently. One generation was respect the title, respect the institution — that was boomers. Gen X was respect the adult, because if not, you're going to go get taken out back and, you know, you're going to have some corporal punishment. And then for millennials, respect totally changed. And that was the first generation we saw that, because you could access anybody — again, going to the phone. Millennials could slide into the president's DMs if they wanted to, or any celebrity they wanted to. Are they going to get a response? Probably not. But there was no barrier. You no longer had to pick up the phone, go through the white pages, dial an operator, and meet with the gatekeeper. It's all one step away, even professionally with LinkedIn. And so you saw them drop titles like doctor and Mrs. and Mister and go casual, first-name basis — even with school teachers and professors. We saw this huge decline with millennials because the rules of respect changed. Not saying they should have or shouldn't have, but then you fast forward to Gen Z and that just continues on the pattern.

Evan Sanchez #

I love the way you put this all together, because it really does highlight the differences of the generations. And, you know, as parents we get in our own heads about — well, that's the way — I mean, even if we don't say it out loud, like "when I was your age," even that sort of energy that they can feel, that kind of judgment or disappointment or shame when they're not able to do things us Gen Xers were at that age. And I think that that's a real lack of understanding on our part. We need to do a better job of meeting them where they are.

Ryan Vet #

And giving them opportunities to build some of those experiences and some of those life skills. I mean, you used "overcorrect" twice now, and that's part of the pendulum that I often write about. It's first we experience something, and then we often challenge it. We don't like the way it is, we push against it — that's usually in our formative years. And then as parents, we often overcorrect. And then finally society recalibrates. So we're even seeing that with Gen Alpha and now Gen Beta. Gen Beta started being born in 2026. We're starting to see it come back, where Gen Z parents and younger-born millennials, they're not allowing their kids any screen time. They're forcing them to go outside. They're engaging in schools that are more skills-based. They're totally transforming those early years, because they're saying, "I was messed up because of my parents, so let me overcorrect." And somewhere in there is the conversation that I have so often, which is AI. You know, how's that impacting kids, and what's that going to do to them? We thought — you know, we were worried about social media. What's AI going to do? And there's some really scary stats we can unpack there with Gen Z and AI use already.

Evan Sanchez #

Let's save that for the next episode. So we'll leave it there. Thank you so much for being on the podcast, Ryan. This has been fantastic. It's really changed my framing and helped me be more understanding. For people who want to get in touch with you, what's the best way to get in touch with you?

Ryan Vet #

Yeah, the best way is to head over to my website, ryanvet.com. You can access the Ryan Vet Show, my podcast. You can access any of my books that I've written. There's a free newsletter that comes out weekly called COLLIDE that does a lot of this research in a much more in-depth, accurately stated way. You know, I do things from the top of my memory on podcasts — I try to keep it accurate, but you can get the actual stats and data there on the COLLIDE newsletter too.

Evan Sanchez #

Yeah. And I subscribe to that newsletter and I love it. It teaches me so much. And I read your book, The Millennial Code, and that was amazing too. It's just, again, getting inside these prisms of how generations work. So thank you again for being on the podcast.

Lightly edited from the episode's automated captions for readability, with obvious transcription errors in proper names corrected (Jonathan Haidt, COLLIDE) and speaker turns reconstructed where the caption track did not mark them.

Bring this conversation to your stage

Ryan keynotes on leading across five generations, turning generational friction into a competitive advantage for your team.